ff 22–37 (23 October) (Joan Furlong's deposition)
Deposicions of witnesses to be examined ‸⸢taken⸣ vppon Interrogatories to them ministred on the parte and
behalfe of his Maiestie
Attorney generall
Complainant against William
Henslowe and Iacob Meade
defendantes before Sir Edward Bromley knighte one of the Barrons of his
Maiestes Courte of Exchequer/
Io Iohane ffurlonge wiefe of George furlonge of the Banckside in the county of Surrey waterman aged fifty eight yeares or thereaboutes sworne and examined | the three and twentieth day of October 1620 deposeth as followeth/
To the first Interrogatory she this deponent sayeth that she very well knew Phillip Hensloe esquire in the Interrogatory named by the space of five and twenty yeares before his decease/
To the second
Interrogatory she this deponent sayeth that she knoweth Certayne
tenementes to the number of tenne or thereaboutes and one little
garden plot Called the greate
Rose
<.>on the
Backside in
the Countye of Surrey
| and hath knowne the same for the
space of fyve and fortye yeares which tenementes and
garden are his Maiestes landes in righte of his Crowne of England
But the Certayne or particuler boundes and lymettes of the
seueral Tenementes and garden plott this deponent
certaynly knoweth not./
To the third Interrogatory she is not required to answere./
To the fowerth Interrogatory she this deponent sayeth that she knoweth the landes on the Banckside aforesaide Called the kinges | Maiestes Landes which are holden by A Lease or demise therof made by the late Queene Elizabeth to Thomas Keyes and Isabell his wiefe. And sayeth that the said Landes called the greate Rose are parcell of the said landes Called the kinges Landes all which this deponent hath knowne for the space of fortye fyve yeares./
To the fifte and sixte
Interrogatory she is not required to answere be examined
To the seaventh Interrogatory she this | deponent sayeth that she knoweth that one David Watson did holde one of the Tenementes Called the Kinges landes as vndertennaunt of the saide Thomas Keyes And he the said Davyd Watson and after his decease his wiefe did paye nyne poundes per Annum to the said Thomas Keyes which said Rent of nyne poundes this deponent knew payed by the said David Watson And after his decease by his wiefe for the space of ffyve and twentye | yeares she this deponent dwellinge in the howse with the said David Watson And after his decease with his wiefe for all the said space And hath dwelt in the same tenemente ever since the decease of the same David Watson and his wiefe/
To the eighte
Interrogatory she this deponent sayeth that she knoweth a parcell of land
or garden grounde heretofore vsed by Pope and Bvrnabye
for A dogge yarde which said
dogge yard is | parcell of the kinges landes
which said dogge yarde is bounded with mayde lane on the one side And with the Pege garden on the other side And on the other
side with St ⸢°Mildredes°⸣
Marie Overie Church
yard
⸢Landes.⸣ on the other side righte north/
To the nynth Interrogatory she this deponent saieth that there are now standinge vppon the grounde Called the dogge yard the buildinges videlicet twoe beare howses one Bull howse one loft to put in haye And A starch howse all | which are in the occupacion of Iacob Meade And were all heretofore built by the said Phillippe Henslow deceased
To the tenth
Interrogatory she this deponent sayeth, that all the land vppon
which the hope play
howse now standeth is the kinges Maiesties land
And hath byne soe taken and reputed for the space of fyve and ffortye yeares to this
deponentes
k knowledge./
To the eleaventh Interrogatory she this deponent sayeth that all the landes from | or beyonde the hope play howse Southward to mayde lane are reputed and taken to be the kinges lands and haue soe byne reputed for the space of fortye fyve yeares/
To the twelveth
Interrogatory she this deponent sayeth that she knoweth the
seuerall howses on the Banckside which Burgis
Tyton
Tayler
Adyson
Spencer
Garland
Rockett
Derrey
Reignoldes and Williamson did holde of the sayde Thomas Keyes and
Is Izabell and that the same were ever for the space of | fforty fyve yeares reputed to be his Maiesties
Landes./
(23 October) (Ruth Munday's deposition)
Ruthe Munday of the parish of St Marie overies
Southwarke widowe aged aged ffortye eighte yeares or
thereaboutes sworne and examined the three and twentieth daye of October
1620 deposeth as ffolloweth./
To the first second third fowerth fifte and sixte Interrogatory she this deponent is not required to be examined/
To the 7th Interrogatory this deponent sayeth that one david watson did hold one Tenement of Thomas Keyes and | Isabell his wiefe scituate on the Bankside and parsell of his Maiesties Land and paide nyne poundes per Annum for the same but how manie yeares hee helde yt this deponent knoweth not./
To the eight Interrogatory shee this deponent saith that shee hath knowen the parcell of grounde heretofore vsed by Pope And Bvrnaby for a Dogge yard to haue bin reputed parcell of his Maiesties Land for the space of ffortie yeares
To the nynth Interrogatorie this deponent saith that there are Certaine buildinges | erected and standinge vppon the dogge yard but by whom yt was built or in whose occupacion the said buyldinge now is this deponent knoweth not
To the Tenth Interrogatory this deponent saith that the Lande or grounde on which the hope play howse now standeth is his Maiesties Land and hath bin soe reputed for the space of fortie yeares and vpwardes to this deponentes knowledge./
To the Eleaventh Interrogatory this deponent sayth that all the Land from or behinde | the hope playhouse Southward to Mayde Lane is reputed to be his Maiestes Land and hath bin soe reputed for the space of fforty yeares and vpwardes And this deponent knoweth one Thomas Stone to whom this deponent was seruant fforty yeares agoe paide Rent to Thomas Keyes for the saide Land which Keyes had a graunte thereof from the Late Queene Elizabeth/
(24 January 1620/1) (Walter Heynes' deposition)
Walter Heynes of Kemberwell in the County of Surrey gentleman aged Twenty fowre yeares or thereaboutes sworne and examned the fowre and twentieth day of Ianuary 1620 deposeth as followeth
To the Last
Interrogatory this deponent sayth that the writinge now shewed to this
deponent at the tyme of his examinacion is a true Coppie extracted out of
the Registry of the dane and Chapter of ⸢Winton⸣
Pinton of a lease granted by the Bishopp of Winchester of Certaine Landes Called
the Cock and Bell lyinge on the
Banckside in the County of Surrey which Coppie was examined
with the Record at Winchester in the sight and ‸⸢presence⸣ of
this deponent and agreeth with ye same Recorde|>
(29 January 1620/1) (Lionel Tichborne's deposition)
Lyonell Titchborne of Greyes Inne in the County of Middlesex gentleman
aged fforty eighte yeares or thereaboutes sworne and examined the nyne and
twentieth of Ianuary one thowsand six hundred and twentieth<..> deposeth as followethe/
To the last Interrogatory this deponent sayeth that the Coppie of the lease nowe shewed to this deponent att the time of this his examinacion ys A true Coppie of A Lease made in the nyne | and twentyeth yeare of Kinge Henrye the eighte And was examined by this deponent with the Record yt selfe remayninge in the Offyce of Augmentacion And agreeth with the same Record./
Examinata et concordata cum Originale
(signed) Edward Bromley
[Footnote: 12: scribal error for 18]
Record title: Exchequer Depositions on behalf of the Attorney General v.
Bishop of Winchester, William Henslowe, and Jacob Meade
Repository: Surrey History Centre
Shelfmark: LM/1154/2
Repository location: Woking
These four depositions are taken from copies of the interrogatories and depositions taken in the Exchequer in 1620 on behalf of plaintiff and defendants in the suit of the Attorney General (related by Edward Alleyn) v. the Bishop of Winchester William Henslowe and Jacob Meade; see Appendix 4: V.
The copies are held by Surrey History Centre in its collection of the papers of the Mores and More Molyneux family of Loseley (SHC: 1154/1 and 1154/2). They differ only in minor spellings and phrasing from the documents held at the National Archives. SHC: 1154/2, however, contains the four depositions which do not appear in the National Archives record and are therefore included here.
The depositions of Joan Furlong and Ruth Monday were taken on 23 October 1620. An order in the court on 15 November gave the counsel for the defendants a week to examine 'twoe witnesses' who had been examined by the prosecutors for the Crown before publication of all the depositions taken; see Appendix 4: V. g.
The depositions of Walter Haynes and Lionel Tichbourne were taken on 24 and 29 January 1620/1. They appear here as witnesses to the authenticity and veracity of a copy of an original 1537-8 lease of the Bell and Cock granted by the bishop of Winchester. Details of the lease are not given. On 10 February, an order of the court of Exchequer allowed time for the bishop of Winchester to examine the two further witnesses; see Appendix 4: V. s.
(undated); English; paper; 38 leaves; 415mm x 305mm; foliated in ink 1–37 in the same hand as the text; good condition; tied at the top, writing on rectos only except f 38 (recto blank) endorsed in a later hand: 'King| &| Bishop of Winchester | [bracketed together with] In Chancery | Old Papers of | Proceedings | and | other Papers, no | Ways usefull|, and in a contemporary hand: Interrogaty<...> gaynst ye bishopp of winchester | William Henslowe & Jacob Mead by barron bromly | [myad at ye dauncing | beares] | the Bankeside busenes aboute [William Henslow & Iacob Mead] | the kinges & the Bishopes landes howe they but & bound.' Interrogatories on behalf of the Attorney General ff 1–21; depositions on behalf of the Attorney General, ff 22–37.