single membrane (29 June)
The Plea and demurrer of Edward Allen Esquire one of the
defendantes
to the bill of of Complainte of Iacobb Meade Complaynant/
This defendant by protestation not confessinge or acknowledginge anie the
matters or thinges in this bill conteyned to be trewe ffor Plea and Demurrer
thearvnto sayeth that longe before the exhibitinge of this bill his Maiestiesa Attournie generall on the behallffe of his
Maiestie by the relacion of this defendant his
Maiesties Tenaunt did exhibitt an Infformacion into his
Maiesties Court of Exchequer Chamber att Westminster against the Right honourable
and Reverend ffather in god the nowe Lord
Bishopp of Winchester and the nowe Complainant and William Henslowe in this
bill named deceased settinge fforth theare by his Maiesties Right and
interest in right of his Crowne to all or the greatest part of the landes
in this bill mencioned, and the nowe Complainant and the said
William Henslowe vnder collour of a lease longe since made by Stephen Gardiner Bishopp of
Winchester, and wheareby the nowe Complainant and the said Henslowe weare
interessed in Certaine landes then and yett belonginge to the Bishopp ‸⸢of⸣ Winchester for the tyme beinge in right of his Bishoppricke
of Winchester and adioyninge and abuttinge vppon his Maiesties
landes did indeavour to deprive his Maiestie of a greate part of
the said landes wheareof his Maiestie is seized in right of his
Crowne as aforesaid, and the better to effect the same did obscure the boundaries
and buttalls wheareby his Maiesties said landes might be
discerned and knowne from the landes belonginge to the said Bishoppricke of Winchester and
heareby deprive his Maiestie of a greate part of his Revenewe and this
defendant of the proffitt that hee should make of his
Maiesties said landes this defendant beinge
possessed thearof by vertewe of a lease longe since made by the late Queene Elizabeth of ffamous memory to
one Livesey and one Goore which is yet in
beinge vndetermined and not expired, the interest thearof by meane Conveyaunces
beinge then and nowe in this defendant, as by the said
Infformacion whearvnto refference beinge had more at lardge it doth and
maye appeare, to which Infformacion the nowe Complainant beinge a
defendant, and the other defendantes named thearin made
and putt in theare seuerall aunsweares thearvnto and his Maiesties
said Attournie generall did replie vnto those aunsweares, and the matter of the said
Infformacion and aunsweares theareby defended and did come to a
perffect issue touchinge the right and boundaries of the landes
in question by this bill, and theare vppon diverse ‸⸢wittnesses⸣ weare examined on his Maiesties
behallffe in that suite in the said Court of Exchequor and by vertue of a Comission
awarded out of the same Court wheare the nowe Complainant and the other
defendantes to the said Infformacion did examine
diverse wittnesses and afterwardes publicacion of the
deposicions of those wittnesses was dewlie entred in the said
Court of Exchequor wheare the same suite doth nowe depend and is ready for hearinge
and is not yet determined; And nowe the Complainant by this bill seeketh to
be releived against this defendant for the Right and boundaries of those
landes for which the said Infformacion is exhibited
vnto his Maiesties said Court of Exchequor Chamber att Westminster wheare the same doth
as is aforesaid yett depend vndetermined, and wheare the right and boundaries of
those landes ought propperlie to be determined; The Complainant by
his owne shewinge acknowledginge by this bill that the defendant doth
Clayme interest to those landes vnder his Maiesties right
or as tenaunt to his Maiestie and if the Complainant be preiudiced
by the other defendantes or William Henslowe in the bill named
touchinge the inioying of the landes in question, It appeareth by his owne
shewinge allsoe in this bill that hee hath taken good securitie from the said
William Henslowe for anie righte that this defendant or his assignes can
make or Clayme thearevnto, And this defendant hopeth it will not stand
with the pleasure of this honourable Court that this
defendant and ‸⸢that⸣ the nowe
Complainant shall proceede to examine wittnesses de novo for the selfe same matters for which diverse
wittnesses have beene examined in the Court of Exchequor aforesaid on
both sides and the deposicions of those wittnesses published, And
thearefore humblie desireth that his Maiestes Attournie generall
who is the person that propperlie ought to maintaine the kinges
Maiesties right to the landes in question maye be
called to maintaine the kinges right to the said landes or to
shewe Cause if this bill ought the premisses considered to proceede in this
honourable Court before the Cause dependinge in the said Court of
exchequer bee ffinallie theare heard and determined. ffor all which Causes
and for diverse other apparant defectes and imperfeccions
in the said Complainantes bill appearinge this defendant
doth with the ffavour and leave of this honourable Court Plead in
barre and demurre and abide in lawe to the Complainantes said
bill, And humblie demaundeth the Iudgement of this honourable Court if hee
shall be Compelled to make anie ffurther or other aunsweare thearvnto. All
which matters this defendant is ready to averre and mainetaine
as this honourable Court shall award, And humblie prayeth to be ffrom hence
dismissed with his reasonable Costes and Chardges in this behallfe
most wrongefullie susteyned/
(signed) Austen
Record title: Court of Chancery: Plea and Demurrer of Edward Alleyn in Meade
v. Alleyn
Repository:
TNA
Shelfmark: C 3/368/80
Repository location: Kew
It seems most likely that this plea and demurrer of Edward Alleyn relates to the 1623-4 Chancery case of Jacob Meade v Agnes Henslowe, Mary Moushurst and Elizabeth Moushurst and Edward Alleyn; see Appendix 4: VIII. Meade's bill of complaint had turned on the question of the ownership and boundaries of the Bear Garden and the Hope playhouse. In this plea and demurrer Alleyn challenges the validity of the complaint on the grounds that an action brought by the attorney general and involving the same grounds and the same parties, was as yet proceeding but undetermined in the court of Exchequer; see Appendix 4:V.
In the event, Meade made his will two days after this plea and demurrer was lodged on 1 July 1624, with a codicil added on the 4th. He was buried on 9 July; see Honigmann and Brock, Playhouse Wills, pp 134–8.
29 June 1624; English; parchment; single membrane; 280mm x 500mm; pin holes on left side; no endorsement; numbered 80 and kept in a box with other loose documents.