ff [1–2] (30 April)
Inter Iohannem
Henslow querentem. Agnetem Henslow
viduam
Edwardum Allen, et Roger Cole
defendantes
By direccion of an order of this honourable Court of the xvth of this instant Aprill, I have considered of the
plaintiffes Bill and defendantes
answere, and of the ‸⸢plaintiffes⸣
thexcepcions thereunvto, and doe thereby finde that the scope of the Bill
is to be releuied against a will
pretended to be made by one Phillip Henslowe now deceased late husband of the said
defendant Agnes Henslowe, and yt is alleadged in the said Bill that
the Phillip
married the said Agnes beinge a widow, whoe had yssue Ioane before the said marriage, and that Philip died
seised in fee of diuerse freehold landes and possessed of
goodes and Chatelles to the value of 10 or 12000 li. and died without
yssue, and that the plaintiffe is next in blood to Phillip and
sheweth howe by discent To which the defendantes Edward
and Agnes answere, that they doe neyther knowe nor beleiue yt to be true, that he
died possessed of an estate of that value, or neare therevnto which I
conceiue to be noe good answere, for that they haue not sett forth any certainty of
estate of the said Phillip what yt was, and the value thereof neyther doe they
answere whether the plaintiffe be next of blood, and heire to the
said Phillip, which in my opinion they ought to haue done/ The
plaintiffe further sheweth that Allen the defendant
marryed Ioane the daughter of Agnes, and knowinge or being informed that the said
Phillip by his will had disposed of his estate amongst his kinsfolkes and
freindes and findinge the said Phillip ‸ ⸢to be⸣
in daunger of death, did practise with thother
defendantes to drawe the said Phillip to alter his will and to
settle all his estate on the said Agnes, and | to make hir
his sole executrix and thother defendantes Overseers,
which Phillip often refused to doe To which point the
defendantes by their answere say That there was not any such
Confederacy amongst them neyther did they or any of them perswade the said
Phillip to alter any former will made, or to settle all his estate vpon the said
Agnes duringe her life and to make hir his sole executrix and thother
defendantes his overseers. which answere is alsoe
insufficyent as I take yt ffor they ought directly to haue answered whether Allen
had married Ioane the daughter of Agnes, (That being laid as inducement to the
practise, and laid to their Chardg. and whether they or any of them did
perswade the said Phillip to settle any parte of his estate vpon
the said Agnes during hir life which they haue not done./ And
whereas the plaintiffe doth Chardge the said Allen that the said
Phillip beinge soe feeble that he was not able to moue his hand, or had any sence to
write or moue a penn, did offer to guide his hand to write his name, and that the
defendantes or some of them worying the said Phillip, the said
Allen did put a pen into his hand, and that Phillip made only a marke
beinge in his life tyme well able to write. And that the defendant Allens
scope was to gaine to himselfe all thestate of the said Phillip by making the said
Agnes his sole executrix whereby he would intitle hir to all the leasses of the said
Phillip To which the defendant Allen doth not answere whether he did offer
to guide his hand to write his name nor whether he did offer to put a penn into his
hand, which I thinke fitt Allen should answere |
he being chardged in the bill to sett the pretended will on foote to gaine
the whole estate to himself./ The plaintiffe likewise by his bill
setteth forth That although Phillip died on the Saturday night, the
defendantes spared not to proue that will on the next
Sabbaoth day in the morning To which point alsoe I am of opo
opinion, the defendantes ought to haue answered, because the
suddenness of the probate, with other thinges, may induce
the greater suspicion of the practise to sett on foote the supposed will.
The rest of the excepcions I conceiue to be fully answered. All
which I humble leaue to the censure of th this most
honourable Court./
(signed) Rychard Moore
For the progress of this case through the court of Chancery, see further Appendix 4: I.
Further disputes over Henslowe's property and its distribution continued into the 1620s; see the Introduction: History of the Properties; Briley, 'Edward Alleyn and Henslowe's Will', pp 324–8.
Record title: Master's Report in John Henslowe v. Agnes Henslowe et
al
Repository:
TNA
Shelfmark: C 38/25
Repository location: Kew
On 30 April 1616, master in Chancery Richard Moore made an initial report on the suit brought by John Henslowe, the nephew of Philip Henslowe, on 23 January 1615/16 against Edward Alleyn, Agnes Henslowe, and Roger Cole; see Appendix 4: I. c. The report summarises the bill and answers, replications and rejoinders of the plaintiff and defendants, the originals of which do not survive. The answers of the defendants were found insufficient, firstly, on the value of Philip's estate; secondly, on the question of whether they had put undue influence and pressure on Philip during the composition of the will; thirdly, on the reasons for the rapid submission of the case through probate.
30 April 1616; English; paper; bifolium; 310mm x 202mm; no pagination, filed with reports arranged chronologically within sequences by the first letter of the first plaintiff's name; leaf edges torn, with central section mouldered away; bound in white vellum over boards, torn along spine, title in ink, 'REPORTS | 1616 | F TO N,' with pasted paper label, '25.'