Item 165, mb 1 (Bill of Complaint)
To the righte honourable Thomas Earle of Suffolk Lord Treasurer of England Sir ffoulke Grevyll knight Sir Lawrence Tanffeilde Lord Cheife Baron of the kinges maiesties saide Exchequer <...>
Sheweth and Informeth to your good
officers Sir Henry
Yelverton knighte the kinges
maiesties
Attournie geneerall
That whereas one Henry Polsteed
Esquire in or aboutes the sixth yeare of the raigne of Kinge Edward the Sixth of ffamous memorie was seized on
his demesne as of ffee or of some other estate of <...> of and in one Capitall
messuage and tenement or Inne Called the vnicorne which he <...> of and in all those
messuages, Cottages, Curtilages, Whariffes, Gardens, Orchards, and
other heredytaments with the appurtenances then or
latelie before in ye <...> or tenancies or occupacion of Iohn Allen, Robert Mote; Robert Iohnson, Leonard Willis, Iohn Dauncye, Thomas Warren, Thomas ffloodye, Robert Exninge and Peter Heminge or of some of them or of their assignes
or of the assignes of some of them, then and at this <...> scituate lyinge and beinge
in the parishe of St
Saviours in the Burroughe of Southwarke in the Countie of Surrey. And the said Henrye Polsteede being soe seized thearof in or
aboutes the said sixte yeare of the raigne of the said kinge Edward the
sixt <...>
messuage Called the vnicorn and all other those messuages, Cottages, Curtilages,
whariffes, Orchards, gardens, and other the heredytaments before
saide then or late before in the severall tenures or occupacions of the
persons before said <...> assignes or assignees of some of them
with the saide kinge Edward the sixte. To haue and to holde the same to
the saide kinge Edward the sixte and to his heires and successors, fforever. By
lease wheareof the saide kinge Edward the <...> messuages <...> and
tenementes taken in exchange from the said
Henrye Polsteede and was seizde thearof in the righte of his Crowne of England to
him his heires and successors ffor ever. And the said kinge Edward the sixte
<...>
lettres Pattentes bearinge date the sixte and twentieth daye of
Aprill in the said sixte yeare of his raigne over this realme, ‸⸢of England⸣ beinge seizde of the said landes in the right of his
Crowne, demised the same to the saide Henry <...> to Comence from the ffeaste of the Annunciation of our
blessed virgin Marye then last past before the date of the saide
lettres Patentes att the yearelie rent of thirtie twoe poundes
ffowre shillinges ffive pence, and after<...> the said messuages, landes, and
<...>
and Came to the late Queene
Elizabeth of ffamous memorye in righte of her Crowne ‸⸢of
England⸣ whoe by her highenes lettres pattentes vnder the
greate seale of England bearinge date att Westminster the eleventh daye of October
<...> Realme
of England, did likewise demise and to ffarme lett the saide messuages,
landes and tenementes soe had in exchange from the said
Henrye Polsteede as before said to Robert Liveseye Esquire and Gerrard Goore
<...>
Queene Elizabeth her heires and successors one tenement and
parcell of land ‸⸢& pondes⸣ Called the
Queenes Pike Garden the same
beinge parcell of the saide premisses soe had in exchange as before saide
from the said Henrye Polsteede <...> except before excepted vnto the said Robert Liveseye and
Gerard Goore theire executors and assignes from the daye of the date of the said
lettres pattentes vnto the full end and terme of ffiftie yeares
from the <...> Compleate and ended att the yearlie rent of seaven and twentie
poundes ffowreteene shillinges tenne pence as by the said
lettres pattentes amongest
other thinges readye to bee shewed to your honourable
Lordshippes<...> is yet in beinge and the tearme of yeares thearein
graunted of the said premisses to the said Liveseye and Goore is yett vnexpired and
not determined, The interest thearof, and of the tearme of yeares thearin
<...>
assignementes in or aboutes the Eight and thirtieth yeare of the
raigne of our late soveraigne Lady Queene Elizabeth, did Come vnto Phillippe Henslowe late whiles hee
lived, of the parishe of Saint Saviours in the said Countie of <...> whoe was
accordinglie possest of the said premisses soe demised by fforce of the said
lettres pattentes made by the said late Queene Elizabeth, and of
the assignement thearof made vnto him and quietlie & peaceablie po<......>d and <...> thearof for aboutes twentye yeares
before his deathe without the deniall or interrupcion of anie
person; which said Phillippe Henslowe in his lifetime in or
aboutes the sixth ydaye of Ianuarie in the thirteenth yeare of the raigne
<...> nowe ys beinge so possessed as beforesaid,
made his laste will and Testament in writinge, and thearof made and ordained Agnes his wiffe executrixe not
gevinge or disposinge theareby the Interest which he had in the
<...>
graunte of the premisses aforesaid
demised by the said late Queene Elizabeth to the said Liveseye and Goore, And
afterwardes hee the said Phillippe Henslowe died possessed as beforesaid
after whose decease the said Agnes <...> of Lawe proved the said will and tooke upon
her the execucion thearof, and by reason thearof was interessed and
invested in the said demise and graunte of the said premisses made from the said
late Queene Elizabeth had of the tearmes <...> to Come and vnexpired, and was in
possession of the said premises demised and graunted as before saide and had and
receaved quietlie the rentes and profittes thearof accordinglie
duringe her life; And shee the said Agnes execut<...> and testament of the said
Phillippe Hensloe deceased in or aboutes the ffifteenth daye of ffebruarie
in the thirteenth yeare of the kinges maiesties raigne that nowe ys, made
allsoe her laste will and testament in wrytynge
<...>
ordayned Ioane her daughter sole
and onelie executrixe without disposinge givinge or bequeathinge the
interest which shee the said Agnes had in the saide demise and graunte and
of the tearme thearin then to Come <...> And afterwardes vizt
aboutes a yeare after the said Agnes died possessed as aforesaid, after
whose deathe, she the said Ioane proved the said will made by the said Agnes by
wittnesses in dewe fforme of lawe <...> of the said will, and thearby was and is
solye Interessed and Invested into the righte of the saide demise and graunte of the
said premisses demised by the said late Queene Elizabeth as afore said and of the
tearmes of <...> Come and vnexpired, And the said Robert Liveseye and Gerard
Goore whoe ffirst had the said demise and graunte of the said premisses from the
late Queene Elizabeth and ⸢all⸣ those vnto whome their
interest thearin <...> meane Conveyaunces vnto the tyme of the exhibitinge of theis
present Informacion, haue well and truelie paied to the kinges
maiestes or receaver for the said Countie of Surrey for the time
beinge the yearelie rent of Twentye seaven poundes
<...>
shillinges tenne pence reserued vppon the said lettres pattentes
made by the saide late Queene Elizabeth and dewe and payable for the said premisses
att the feastes and since limitted for the payment of the said
rent by <...> of the said late Queene Elizabeth. But now soe yt is maye it
please your honorable Lordshippes That ‸⸢the right reverend father in god Lancelott Andrewes
Bisshop of
wynchester⸣
William Hensloe of Buxteede in the Countie of
Surreye gentleman and Iacobbe
Meade of the parishe of St Saviours <...> Countie of Surrey waterman, well knowinge the
premisses to bee trewe and that the said landes soe had in
exchange by kinge Edward the sixte as before saide from the said Henry Polsteede are
Come and discendeded
<...>
that nowe ys in the righte of his Crowne of England, and that the kinges
maiestie and his predecessors before named kinges and Queenes of England
haue allwayes from tyme to tyme sithence the said exchange vnto <...> of this
Informacion, received the rentes thearof and disposed of the
same att theire will and pleasure; yett they the said ‸⸢Lord
Bisshop of Wynchester⸣ William Hensloe and Iacobbe Meade
haue and doe Confederate and Clayme ‸⸢ioyne⸣
togeather <...> kinges maiestie of the entire estate of the premisses
and of the rentes and profittes dewe and payable to his
maiestie in righte of his Crowne for the said premisses, but allsoe what
in them lieth to obscure the said premisses and <...> boundes limittes and
names thearof so yat ye same shall not bee discerned or knowne from ye
landes of ye said Bishoppe of Winchester which he holdeth in
righte of his Bishoppricke and abuttinge and beinge neare adioyninge to ye
said premisses and <...> had in exchange from the said Henrye
Polsteed as before said, which landes belonginge to ye said
Bishoppe of Winchester, weare by Stephen
Gardyner late bishoppe of winchester vnder his Episcopall seale in
yat Nyne and thirtyeth <...> Eighth demised and lett to ffarme to william Payne of Southwarke
aforesaid yeoman for ye terme of nyntie nyne yeares, which said lease alsoe
by meane Conveyaunces and assignementes derived from and vnder the
said William <...> sithence Cause and weare Conveyed to ye said
Phillippe Henslowe before his death, whoe was allsoe in possession thearof, for ye
space of Twentie yeares before his deathe whoe by his laste will and
testament did geve <...> lease which hee had and held vnder ye
said Bishoppe of Winchester, and ye terme of yeres therein to Come vnto
ye said william Henslowe on theis wordes ffollowinge vizt. Item I
give and bequeath after ye decease of <...> assignees all that my messuage mansion
‸⸢howse⸣ and lease Called the Beare Garden with all ye
tenementes and appurtenances therevnto belonginge
which I holde and enioye by <...> ye said ‸⸢now bishopp of winchester⸣ William Henslowe and
Iacobbe Meade doe pretend publishe and geve out yat all ye
premisses which ye kinges majestie holdeth on righte of
his Crowne of England by fforce of ye said exchange made with the
said Henry Polsteede <...> vnto the kinges maiestie but yat ye
same are ye said landes belonginge to ye ‸⸢now⸣ bishoppe of winchester which weare leased by the said Stephen
Gardyner late bishoppe of winchester to ye said william Payne, and in <...> Hensloe by
vertue of the said legacie and bequest geven to him ‸⸢by⸣ the
said Phillippe Henslowe of the interest of the said lease made by the said bishoppe
of winchester as aforesaid to ye said Payne and the said William
<...>
pretend<.> himselfe to bee
vndertenaunte to ye said ‸⸢nowe bisshopp of wynchester and ⸣
William Hensloe of the said landes leased by ye bishoppe of winchester as
aforesaid, haue vnder Coloure of ye said legacie and bequest and vnder Coloure of ye
said longe occupacion <...> in one and ye same hand possest themselues not onelie of
ye landes leased by ye bishoppe of Winchester, but allsoe of ye said
premises belonginge to ye kinges maiestie in righte of his
Crowne vnder pretence yat ye said landes
belonginge to ye Bishop of Winchester <...> with‸⸢ine⸣ ye said
premises belonginge to ye kinges maiestie had in exchange from
Henrie Polsteede as aforesaid, And to ye purpose haue and doe of themselues sett and
make ffalse bondes betweene the said premisses belonginge to the kinges
<...>
belonginge to the bishoppe of winchester, and doe soe make and sett ye said ffalse
bondes within and vppon the kinges maiesties landes vizt
ffarre beyond a newe buildinge which ye said Philiippe Hensloe builte a
lyttle <...>
by the name of the Hope
Playehouse, and theareby possesst themselues of a great parte of the
said landes belonginge to the kinges maiestie, and Claime the same
vnder Colours and by vertue of the said lease made by the said <...> winchester
‸⸢and as landes proper and belonginge to the
nowe Lord Bisshopp of Wynchester in right of his Bisshoprick⸣ they well
knoweinge that the said landes belonginge to the bisshopp of winchester and
graunted in lease by the said Stephen Gardener late bishoppe of winchester doe
extend themselues and are bounded <...> Southward vnto within eighte
ffoote of the North side of the ‸⸢said⸣ newe buildinge Called
the Hope Playehouse, and Eastward to a Common Sewere theare, and ‸⸢ westward⸣to <.>
house theare Called the Blew
Boare late in the tenancie of one William <...> Playhouse it selfe and
‸⸢all⸣the groundes and landes lyinge
Southward from thence to a Certaine lane theare Called Mayden lane and all the groundes and
landes lieing Eastward from the said Common Sewere to a Certane
Allie theare Called <...> the said house Called the Blewe Bore to a tenement
theare now in the tenure of hodgkin
<...>
being the kinges maiesties said landes and premisses late had in
exchange from the said Henry Polsteede as aforesaide, but the said Iacobb
<...>
said Phillipp Hensloe att the time when he layed the ffoundacion for the
said newe building Called the Hope Playehouse, had once directed the
ffoundacion thearof to bee soe layed as that the same buildinge would
haue stood vppon <...> ye Bishopps landes. But ye said Phillipp
‸⸢Henslowe⸣ being advertised of the inconvenience
yat might arise thearby did thearvpon alter his purpose, and openlie
declare and make knowe yat he would erecte ye said newe buildinge soe neare
as hee <...>
theareuvppon did sett the said newe buildinge and make the ffoundacion
thearof soe ffarre as hee Could Southward from the place wheare hee ffirst Intended
to lay the foundacion thearof; ‸⸢and did sett the same
wholie vppon the kinges maiesties said landes and they the said
w<...>⸣
<...>
william Henslowe and Iacob <...> with the more ffacillitie obscure the trewe
boundes and limittes of the kinges maiesties said landes
they doe publishe and divuldge nowe names wheareby they would haue the said
landes and premisses beinge his maiesties inheritance
to bee <...>
haue them reputed to bee the landes belonginge to the Bishoppe of Winchester, and
the said William Henslowe and the said Iacob Meade as <..> vndertenant ‸⸢ to the said Bisshopp of
Winchester⸣ doe receive and take the rentes and profittes
of the said landes belonginge <...> incroached vppon and obscured as aforesaid
vnder Colours of the saide false boundes as belonginge to them as
<...>
or vndertenantes to the Bishoppe of Winchester and as for landes
demised by the said lease Made by the same Stephen <...> winchester to the said
Willyam Payne whearby the kings maiestie is greatlie preiudiced in
his Inheritance, and his lessees thearby allsoe disabled to paie to the kings
maiestie the rent dewe and payable to his maiestie for the said
<...>
the said Henrie Polsteede as aforesaid, and demised by the late Queen Elizabeth to
Robert Livesey and Gerrard Goore as is allsoe aforesaid, and the said Iacobbe Meade
whoe oughte to paye a greater parte of the rent <...> of the kinges
maiesties said landes to the kinges maiesties lessees for that
he holdeth the said newe erected buldinge Called the Hope and daiverse
other parcelles of the said Landes belonginge to the
kinges maiestie vnder the graunte and <...> of their assignes thearof, and theire
assignes yett doth hee detaine the same from the kinges maiesties
said Lessees and their assignes and doth wrongfullie and iniustlie paie or satisffie
the <...>
to the said William Henslowe <...> to paye and satisffie the same to the kinges
maiesties lessees or their assignes and the said Iacob Meade is the
<...>
soe to doe: ffor that the said William Hensloe by promise and Confidereacie
had betwene <...> entered into bond ‸⸢& is bounde⸣ in
some writinge obligatorie to the said Iacob Meade in a greate sum of money vppon
‸⸢Condicion⸣ that the said william henslowe should
secure and save him the said Iacobbe Meade <...> for the paye<...> William Henslowe for or
in respecte of anie parte of the said landes with the
said Iacobe Meade is possessed of <...> to the said William Henslowe or to the
assignes of the lessees of the land belonginge <...> or to such or the like effecte or purpose:
In tender Consideracion whearof and for that the kinges maiestie
is likelie to bee greatlie preiuduced in his Inheritaunce and in the vertuewe of his
Crowne by the said Co<...> of the said ‸⸢nowe Lord Bisshopp
of Wynchester⸣ william hensloe and Iacobbe Meade ‸⸢and to the end<...> said <...> William Henslowe and Iacobbe Meade⸣ maye
discouer vppon theire oathes the trewe abuttmentes and
boundaries of the said landes and premises belonginge to the
kinges maiestie and graunted in lease by the late Queene <...> and Gerrard
Goore as aforesaid, and what the abuttmentes and boundaries thearof haue
Commonlie and auntientlie ‸⸢beene⸣ reputed and
knowne to bee; and what they and <...> of them haue knowne and taken the same to
bee <...>
and vnderstandinges, and what and howe much of the said rentes dewe &
payeable by the said Iacobbe Meade either to the said william henslowe or to the
assignes of the lessees of the kinges maiestie <...> said william hensloe and
howe much of the said rentes the said Iacobbe Meade hath or deteineth in
his handes or Custodye, And how much of the said rentes they or either of
them doe know ‸⸢ it⸣ is proper or belonginge <...>
maiesties said lessees or theire assignes for landes
which the said Iacobbe Meade holdeth of them or anie of them and how many
‸⸢and what⸣ parte of the said landes the said
Iacob Meade doth holde vnder the kinges maiestie <...> and if the saide william
henslowe hath att anie tyme heretofore entered into a true <....> bond or wrytynge obligatorie to the said Iacobbe Meade as
is fformerlie mencIoned <...> the like effect <...>: bond or wrytinge
obligatorie is, and to the end theare might bee a trewe abuttment or boundarie of
the kinges maiesties said landes soe had in exchange from the said
Henry Polsteede as aforeasid, sett fforth either <...> grounded vppon the
<...>
evidences and vppon testimonie of wittnesses or
otherwise by Comission to bee awarded to Comissioners to bee Indifferentlie named by
your Lordshippes whoe maye haue power and <...> landes and
premisses and auntient evidences that Concerne <...> and vppon examinacion of
wittnesses to sett forth the trewe abuttmentes and boundaries of the said
landes and premisses belonginge to the kinges <...> graunted to his
maiesties said Attornie generall ‸⸢<...>⸣ vnto the Lord Bisshop of winchester
<...>
right Reverend father in God Launcelot Andrews nowe Lord Bishop of Wynchester whose
Inheritance the Iustices <...> the kinges maiesties writt of subpoena
to bee directed to them the said william henslowe and Iacobbe Meade Comaundinge them
and either of them <...> your honourable good Lordshippes in the kinges
maiesties Exchequer Chamber att a Certaine daye and vnder a Certaine
paine thearin to bee limited then and theare to aunsweare the premisses truelie
<...>
order and Iudgement thearin as to your honourable Lordshippes shall seeme
meete./
Item 165, mb 2 (8 June) (Answer of William Henslowe and Jacob Meade)
The ioynte and severall answeres of William Hensloe &
Iacob Meade, defendantes
to thinformacion of Sir Henry Yelverton knight his
Maiesties Atturney generall:/
The said
defendantes saveing to themselves all advantages of excepcion to
the incertainty and insufficiency of the said Informacion for answere
therevntofor themselves severally saie, that they doe not knowe neither can depose
that Henry Polstead in the said informacion named was seized of the
Messuages and Landes in the said informacion specified, as is herby
supposed or that the said Henry Polstead did exchaunge the said premisses
with his Maiesties Progenitour Kinge Edward the sixt as
in the said informacion is alsoe suggested for the said defendant
William Hensloe saith, that hee hath made diligentt search in the Rolles
to finde the said supposed deede of exchaunge but cannot finde any such
amonge the Recordes there, neither doe these defendantes knowe,
that the said Kinge Edward ‸⸢the sixt⸣ did demise the
premises to the said Henry Polstead as is alsoe in the said informacion
‸⸢alledged⸣ or that the premisses did come by diferent or
otherwise to the Late Queene Elizabeth as is also informed, but therein these
defendantes humbly referre themselves to the Recordes and
proofes in that behalf wherein these defendantes doo not in any sorte
oppose his Maiesties title to the premisses if the same may be made
appeare, But these defendantes saie, that they thinke it to be true that
the said Late Queene Elizabeth by her letteres Pattenttes vnder
the greate seale of England, bereing date as ‸⸢in⸣ the
informacion is sett forth did demise the premisses to Robert Livesey
Esquier and Gerrard Gore ‸⸢in⸣ such
<...> manner and
with such reservacione & excepcion and for such terme
and tyme, & vnder the rentt in the said informacion truely sett forth
and that thentrest of the said lease did come by mesne Assignement to
Phillipp Hensloe in the said informacion named, and that hee was
<..>
possessed there ‸⸢of⸣ accordingly & that hee tooke the profittes
therof about twenty yeares before his death, without any
interruppcion, And whereas yt is informed, that the said Phillipp Hensloe
being possessed of these premisses, made his last will and
Testament in wryteing & thereof made Agnes his wife his executrix and
that hee did not thereby give or dispose, thentrest which hee had in in the said demise,
vnder the graunt made by the late Queene Elizabeth to Livesey and Gore as aforesaid,
but did thereby giue and bequeath to this defendant William
Hensloe, all thentrest of the said Phillipp to the Landes and Lease, which hee had
and held vnder the Bishopp of <....>
Winchester, the said defendant William Hensloe therevnto saith, that hee
doth not knowe, that the said Phillipp made any such will, but if hee did, the same
was vnduely and frauduelently procured, by practise and Confederacy of one
Edwarde Allen, thereby to frustrate and make voide A former will, which
this defendant hopeth to proove was made by the said Phillipp (whereby the
said Phillipp Hensloe did giue and bequeath <........> to this defendant being his brother and heire and
neerest of bloode, the greatest part of his the said Phillipps
personall estate, to A very great value,) & to place the same
vppon the said Agnes his wife. Whoe was very Aged, by meanes whereof the said
Edward Allen doubted not, but that in verye shorte tyme to obtaine to
himself all the estate of the said Phillipp haueing married Ioan the daughter of the
said Agnes which intruth hee did effect accordingly for
thexaminacion of which practise to conceale to
conceale A former Will and to sett a foote A latter will as aforesaid; this
defendant hath exhibitted his Bill of Complainte in his
Maiesties High Courte of Chauncerye against the said Allen,
which is there depending vndetermined, and this defendant William
Hensloe further saith, that if the said <...>Phillipp Hensloe did make any Will as is pretended the
same was directed by notes in wryteinge which were not pursued in the draft of ye
said will according to the said notes, for this defendant hath credibly
heard ‸⸢and doubteth not to proue⸣ that the note
whereby the draught of the said supposed will was directed was in theis
wordes. After the death of Agnes his wyfe he gaue vnto William
Hensloe his brother the yeares of the lease of the Beare garden and the
Tenementes therevnto adioyning holden of the Bishopp of
Winchester and therevpon a will was made and drawen vp by the Scryvener directly in other wordes, as
theis defendantes hope to prove in such manner as in the said
Informacion is sett forth. Neuerthelesse if the will had beene in the
same wordes sett forth in the said Informacion yet theis
defendantes are aduised that by the same is devised to this
defendant William Hensloe all the house, landes and lease whatsoeuer
knowen by the name of the Bearegarden whether the same be thenheritance of his
Maiestie or of the Bishopp of Winchester And as concerning the probate of
the said supposed will by the said Agnes in due forme of lawe theis
defendantes therein cannot depose; but referre themselues to the
proofe thereof, neyther doe they hold the same materiall being a will concerning
landes show the same was proued. And theis defendantes doe
confesse that they haue heard that the said Agnes made her Will in wryteinge and
made Ioane her daughter executrix as is informed and dyed, but how duely the same
will was made theis defendantes cannot depose, And theis
defendantes doe deny that they confederate and combyne
together to defraud the kinges Maiesties of anie the
premisses or of the rentes and profittes due and
payeable to his Maiestie in right of his Crowne for the premisses or to
obscure the premisses where they lye and the Bondes,
lymittes or names thereof, or doe publish and divulge new names soe that
the same maie not be decerned or knowne from the landes of the Bishopp of
Winchester or doe entytle the said Bishop to anie the Landes belonging to his
maiestie neyther doe these defendantes knowe how to
distinguish the same of there owne knoweledge, neither doe these
defendantes or anie of them sett & make false boundes, neither doe
theis defendantes knowe the same to be soe bounded as is sett
forth in the said Informacion but theis defendantes
thinke yt will falle out vpon proofe that all the Messuages & landes
called the beere garden, except only one Bull house is thenheritance of
the said Bishop & not his Maiesties Inheritance, But theis
defendantes are very indefferent whether the Messuages &
landes in the occupacion of theis defendantes
or anie of them be holden of his Maiestie or of the said Bishop. as of his
Bishippricke and are very desirous that the landes belonging to his
Maiestie may be distinguished & knowne from the landes of
the Bishop thervnto adioyning either by Comission or otherwise as this
honourable Court shall thinke fitt as it is desired by the said
Informacion wherin theis defendantes will give their
best assistance to discover the truth & to distinguish the said landes
according to the right, ffor neither theis defendantes nor anie of
them nor their or either of their assignes doe hould or enioye anie other Messuages
or landes late Phillipp Hensloes but such Messuages & landes ‸⸢as⸣ are parcell & belonging, & knowne by the name of
‸the Beere garden as theis
defendantes hope to prove, and theis
defendantes are aduised that by vertue of the said supposed will
the said william henslowe is to have all the beere garden whether the same
be thenheritance of his Maiestie or of the said Bishop, neiverthelesse the
said Allen or his assignes doe deteine from the said defendant hensloe a
great parte of the said Beare Garden as theis defendantes
hope to prove and theis defendantes doe confesse that they thinke
it to be true that Stephen Gardiner late Bishop of Winchester about the tyme in the
Informacion specified did make a lease to William Paine in the
‸⸢said⸣ Informacion named for such terme &
tyme as is therby declared And that the same by meane assignmentes
came to the said Phillip Hensloe & that he was possessed accordingly as
is informed. And the said defendant Iacob Mead doth deny that he doth knowe
yat the said Phillip Hensloe when he laid the foundacion for the
newe building called the hope playhouse had once directed the
foundacion therof to be soe laid as that the same building would have
stood part vpon the Kinges Maiesties
landes & part vpon the Bishopps landes & ‸⸢that⸣ he did afterwardes openly declare yat
& make knowne yat he would erect the said newe building onely vpon the
Kinges Maiesties land, neither doe theis
defendantes certenly knowe whether the same be erected vpon his
Maiesties land or vpon the Bishops land or vpon both. And wheras
it is alsoe enformed yat the said defendant Iacob Meade doth
occupie parte of his Maiesties landes & ought to pay
agreate parte of the rent due to his Maiestie this
defendant saith that he doth not to his knowledge occupie anie of his
Maiesties land vnder the said william Hensloe but the said newe
erected building called the hope & other the landes in this
defendantes occupacion were ever hitherto reputed to be
parcell of the beargarden & to be parcell of the Bishopes land
& not his Maiesties land, but howsoever whether the same be his
Maiesties land or the Bishops land this
defendant as he is advised ought to paie his rent to the said
other defendant his lessor according to the reservacion conteyned
in the lease made of the premisses to the defendant Meade &
not to his Maiestie & the said William Hensloe as his
Maiesties tenant as this defendant is advised & ought to
paye the rent to his Maiestie if ther be anie due by him to paie, And theis
defendants doe denie all practise & confederacie betwene them theis
defendants or that the defendant Hensloe hath entred into anie
such wryting obligatorie to thother defendant as is enformed, but yt is
true that the said william hensloe when hee did lease the landes nowe in
the occupacion of the said Meade to the said Meade did become bounde to the
said Meade by his wryteing obligatorye with Condicion therevppon
endorsed, that the saide Meade, payeing the Renttes reserved vppon his said
lease should quietly enioy the premisses soe demised according to the
purporte of the said lease or to that effect, as by the same (remaineing in the
Custodie of the said Meade, relacion being herevnto had) will appeare And
these defendantes farther saye, that they cannot discover neither
doe knowe of their owne knowledge, the true Abbuttments and boundaries of the landes
& premysses belonging to his Maiestie & graunted by the said late
Queenes Maiestye to the said Robert Livesey and Gerrard Goore or what the
Abbuttmentes and boundaries thereof haue bene Commonly and
aunciently reputed and knowne to be, & therfore cannot depose any
otherwise herein but, referre themselves therein to the Bishoppes lease which is in
the possession of the said Allen, and to thauncientt records concerninge the same,
And the said Iacob Meade for himself farther saith, that ‸⸢he⸣ hath from tyme to tyme sithence the lease to him made by the
said
William Hensloe, paid his rent to the said Hensloe according to his said
lease which hee thinketh to be due vnto him, & hee doth not knowe that hee ought
to paie any rentt to any of thassignes of the lessees of the kinges
Maiesty and this defendant doth not to his knowledge deteyne in
his Custodye any rentt due to his Maiesty or ‸⸢to⸣
the said Hensloe neither doo these defendantes knowe that any
parte of the Renttes payeable by the said defendant is
proper to ye kinges Maiestie or to his
Maiesties Lessees or their assignes or any of them or to any
other, then to the said William Hensloe without that, that the
said Agnes by reason of the probate of the supposed will of the said
Phillipp Hensloe was enteressed & Invested in the demise &
graunt of the premisses, made as aforesaid by the said late Queene
Elizabeth, And of the terme of yeares therein ‸⸢to ⸣ come and
vnexpired, as in the said informacion is pretended, And without
that, that any other matter or thinge in the said informacion conteynwd
Materiall or effectuall in the Lawe to answered vnto & not sufficiently
Answered, Confessed and avoided traversed or denyed is true: All which these
defendantes are readye to Averr and prove As your
Lordshipp & this honorable Courte shall Awarde, and humbly praie to
be dismissed this Court which their Costes vniustly susteyned:/
Iurati octavo die Iunij Anno Regni
Regi Iacobi Anglie etc.
sextodecimo Coram me (signed) Iohn Dinham
Item 165, mb 3 (Rejoinder of William Henslowe and Jacob Meade)
The Reioinder of William Hensloe and Jacob Meade
defendantes
to the informacion ⸢exhibitted etc⸣ by Sir
Henry Yelverton his Maiesties Atturney generall:
The said
defendantes saveing to themselves all advantage of
excepcion to the incertainety and insufficiencye of the
Replicacion of his Maiesties said Atturney for Reioinder saie in
all and every matter and thinge, as they in their ioint and severall Answers haue
saide, and doe and will Averre iustifie maintaine, and prove, all and every the
matters therein Conteyned, to be rigt and true, in suche sorte manner and forme, as
in and by the same is truely declared, And doe and will Averre, and hope to prove,
that the said Phillipp Hensloe by his said Last Will in Wryteing, did give and
dispose th'enterest and estate, which hee had in the Messauges & landes in ye
said informacion specefied, under the graunte made by ye late Queene
Elizabeth to Liuesey and Gore, as in the said answere is truely sett forth. And doe
alsoe Averre and hope to prove, that the said will of the said Phillipp Hensloe in
th'informacion & Replecacion specified, was directed, by
notes in Wryteing which were not pursued in the draft of the ⸢same⸣
saide Will, as in the said answear is truely sett forth, but doe
apparanttly differ, and was wrested to another sence and meaneing, then the testator
by the saide Note, did expresse, and declare the same, in such manner, as is thereby
truely declared, without that that these defendantes doe Combyne
or Confederate togeather to defraude the Kinges Maiestie of the premisses
or any parte thereof ‸⸢or of any the renttes &
profittes thereof⸣ in any sorte due and payable to his
Maiestie in Right of his Crowne of Englande for the same, or to obscure
all or any the premisses where they lye, or the boundes limittes,
or names thereof, or do<.> publish and divulge newe names,
for that the premisses maie not be discerned, and knowne from the lande of
the Lord Bishopp of Winchester, or that these defendantes doe
entitle the said Byshoppe to his Maiesties landes, as in the saide
Replicacion is vntruely suggested, And without that, that these
defendantes or any of them, haue sett and made false the
bounders of the premisses in such sorte as in the informacion and
Replicacion, is also pretended, And these
defendantes saie and thinke it will fall out vppon proofe, that
all the Messuages and landes Called the Bearegardine, are the Auncient inheritance
of the sea, and Bisshoppricke of Winchester, and not his Maiesties inheritance: And
the said defendant Meade for further reioynder saith, and doth Confesse
yat while th'intrest of the said Messuages and landes Called the
Bearegardin were in the said Mistresse Henslowe in the said Replicacion
named, hee the saide defendant Meade, being Tenaunt of all the
said Bearegardin, did paie his rentt to the saide Mistresse Henslowe, as by his
lease hee ought to doe, and when th'intrest of the said lease came to th'other
defendant, Hensloe, then this defendant did and doth ever
sithence, (as hee Conceaveth hee ought to doe,) paye his rentt to the said other
defendant but doth not conceave howe his payment of his rentt, is any
Argument to prove his Maiesties title to the said landes: And this
defendant alsoe averre⸢th⸣, and thinketh to prove,
that the landes in his occupacion was ever reputed to be parcell
of the said Bearegardin, and parte of the saide Bishoppes inheritance,
& not his Maiesties inheritance & without that, that anie
other Matter or thinge in the said replicacion conteyned materiall to be
reioined vnto and not reioined vnto confessed & avoided trauersed, or
denyed is true, all which these defendantes are readye to averre
& prove, as this Courte shall Awarde, & pray as formerly
they haue praied:/ (signed) Iohn Dauies
Item 165, mb 4 (3 February 1619/20) (Answer of Lancelot, Bishop of Winchester)
The severall answeres of the Right reuerend father in God Lancelot Bishop of Winchester one of the Defendantes to the information of Sir Henry Yelverton knight his Maiesties Atturney general./
All advantages of
exception to the incertainty and the insufficiency of the said information now and
at all times hereafter to this defendant saved, for answere to the said
Information (for so much as remeneth the enheritance of this
defendantes Bishoprique of winchester for
which only this defendant is made a party to the said information)
he saith that as it appeareth vnto him by the recordes of the Bishoprique
and Church of winchester Stephen some times Bishope of winchester one of the
predecessors of this defendant in the one and thirtyth yeare of King Henry
the eight was lawfully seised in fee as in
righte of his Bishoprique of winchester of and in Certaine Capitall meases
and tenementes called the
Bardge
the Bell and the Cocke
with thappurtenances set lying and being vpon the bank then called the
stewes in
the parish of St Marie in Southwark
which parish of St Maries together with the parishe of St Margaretes was
afterwa<..> (as this
defendant is informed) changed by acte of parlement in the two and
thirtyth yeere of the said King Henry the eight into the name of the parish of
St Sauiors and thence is now comprehended in the same name of the parisshe of St
Sauiors, and the said Stephen predecessor to this defendant being so seised
did by his deed endented bearing date in the said one and thirtith yeere of King
Henry the eight demise all and every the said Capitall meases and
tennementes Called the Bardge the Bell and the Cocke
with thappurtenances to one William Paine then of Southwarke
yeoman (which as this defendant verely thinketh is the same
William Paine Mencioned as lessee to the said Stephen in the said information) to
haue and to hould all and every the premises to the said William Paine and his
assignes for Ninty nine yeeres from the date of the said deed endented under a
certaine yeerly rente in the said deed expressed wherevnto reference being had it
will more appeare; and in the same lease so then made by the said Stephen
predecessor to this defendant the said Capitall Meases and
tennementes so demised are thus bounded and abutted that is to
say they are expressed to be abutting and lying against the kinges high way next to
the water of Thames on the Northe side and againste a tenemente Called the rose on the este side and
againste a tennement somtimes the
prioresse of Stratfordes on the west side and againste a Lane called Maiden
Lane one the south side with boundaries (as this defendant is
informed by the said lease and other the evidences of the said Bishoprique
and Church of Winchester and by other ⸢prooffes⸣
prfes) are or weare and now ought to be the true and ancient limites and
boundes of the meases and tennementes there scituate and being of the
ancient seisin and inheritance of the Bishoprique of winchester and as for
any other new names of the boundes set forth in the information this
defendant knoweth not of any such and the defendant further
saith ‸⸢that⸣ the ‸⸢said‸⸣ meses and
Tennementes ‸⸢so⸣ demised by the said late
Bishoppe ‸⸢haue⸣
hath bine euersince inioyed by the tennauntes
of the said Bishopprique or their assignes and the rentes reserved
vpon the said demise from tyme to tyme answered and paid by the Tennantes
thereof to this defendant and his successors
predecessors accordingly as by the accountes of the said Bishopprique
appeareth. And this defendant further saith that he knoweth not of any such
leases made either by the said late King Edward the sixt to the said Polstede in the
informacion named or by the said late Quene Elizabeth to the said Liuesey
and Gore nor of any of the mean assignmentes of the said pretended
leases as in the said information is set forth, but what leases soever were made to
them or any of ⸢o⸣ them by eyther the said King or Quene or
what assignementes or mean conveyances were made afterwardes to
the said Philip Hensloe named in the Informacion of any leases from the
Crowne of any landes or tennementes were adioining to the
‸⸢meases and ⸣ landes in question, this
defendant verely thinketh ‸⸢that⸣ the intereste of
the said lease so Made as aforesaid in ‸⸢the⸣ one and
thirtieth yeer of ‸⸢ King Henry⸣ the
eight by the said Stephen late Bishoppe of Winchester to the
aforesaid<.> William
Paine did by meane Conveyances Come vnto the handes of the said Phillipe
°Hensloe° as in the said information is set
forth which Phillipe °Hensloe° (as this
defendant thinketh) or his assignes or some other that haue Claymed from
him being to gether possessed both of some other landes and
tennementes there adioyning and also of the said landes
& tennementes of the ancient seisin and right of the said
Bishoprique did as this defendant verely thinketh heretofore
alter chaing and Confound those Certaine and
anciently knowne limites and boundes before mencioned of the said
landes and tennementes belonging to the said
bishoprique without that ‸⸢that⸣ the
boundes and limites of the measesand landes lying there
on the said banke and being of the ancient seisin and inheritance of the said
bishoprique, are according as in the said information they are expressed
‸⸢and without that that⸣ all the groundes and
landes lying southward from thence to a Certaine lane there called Maiden
lane and further bounded as in the said information they are bounded, are the
landes of the Kinges Maiestie as in the said
information is set forth and as Concerning all other the Matters set forth in the
Information this defendant is ‸⸢a⸣ meere strainger
there vnto and therefore can
⸢canne⸣ say nothing their in Neither is it materiall to this
defendant as he Conceueth if it weere trve true as is alledged
and without that that any other Matter clause or suggestion in the said
information Comprehended and here not sufficiently answered confessed and avoided or
trauersed is true all which this defendant doubteth not
to proue to this honorable Courte and so prayeth to be dismissed the same
with his resonable Costes and Chardges./
°prestitit sacramentum tertio die februarij 1619 coram°
(signed) Lawrence Tanfild
Item 165, mb 6 (Replication of Sir Henry Yelverton, Attorney General)
The Replicacion of Sir Henry Yeluerton knight his Maiesties Atturney generall to ye ioynct and seuerall Answeres of William Hensloe and Jacob Meade defendantes
His
Maiesties said Atturney doth averr mainteine and iustifye his said
Informacion and all and euerye the matters and thinges
therein Conteined to be true and iust in such sorte manner and forme as in
the saide Informacion the same be sett furth and declared And all advantage
and benefitt of excepcion to ye incertainty and insufficiency of
the defendantes said Answere to his Maiesties said
Atturney now and att all times hereafter saved and referred for raplicacion
therevnto he saith and doth averr that the said Phillip Hensloe in the
Informacion mencioned being possessed of the premisses in ye
Informacion made his will and testament in writing and thereof
made Agnes his wife his executrix and that he did not thereby give or despose the
Interst which he had in the said
demise vnder the grant made by the late Queene Elizabeth to Livesey and
Goore but did thereby give and bequeath to the defendant William
Hensloe all the interst of the said Phillip to ye
lands and lease which he holds vnder the Bushop of winchester in such sorte
as in the said Informacion is truely sett furth and declared And his
Maiesties said Atturney doth averr that the said will of ye said Phillip
was not made unduely and fraudulently by practise and Confederacy in such sorte or
to any such intent and purpose as in the said Phillipp Hensloe his Answeree is
pretended Without that that the defendant William Henslowe was
brother and heire and nearest of blood vnto the said Phillipp Henslowe as in the
said William Henslowe his Answere is pretended And whereas the
defendant William Henslowe pretends that he exhibited a Bill
vnto his Maiesties High Court of Chancery against the said Mr
Allen his Maiesties said Atturney saith that true it is that the said
William Henslowe preferred two generall Bills of
Complaint against the said Allen into the said Court of Chancery
vnder some pretence of title to the premisses now in question in which said
suites the said Mr Allen obteined two generall dismissions as by
the proceedinges therein wherevnto reference be had may more fully and att
lardge appeare. Without that that the said Will made by the said Phillipp Henslowe
was directed by notes in writing which were not pursued in the draught of
the said Will in such sorte as in the Answere of the said William Henslowe
is pretended ffor his Maiesties said Atturney saith that the said will was
directly and orderlye made according to the true meaning of the said
Testatour Without that that the note whereby the draught of the said
Phillipp Henslowes will was directed was in these words after the death of Agnes his
wife he gave vnto William Henslowe his brother the yeares of the lease of
the Beare garden and the tenementes therevnto adioyning holden of the
Bushopp of Wincester as in the said William Henslowe his Answere is
pretended ffor his Maiesties Atturney saith that the note soe made was and
is agreeing with the last ‸⸢will⸣ and testament of the said
Phillipp Henslowe as the same is proved and readye to be showen vnder seale and the
true mencion and meaning of the said testatour was pursued in the
said will and not wrested to anye other sence but as the testatour did
expresse and declare the same And his Maiesties said Atturney further saith
that in respect the said Phillipp Hensloe his last will and testament was much
opposed by the said William Henslowe the defendant the same was proved in
due forme of Lawe by verye sufficient Witnesses And his Maiesties said
Atturney doth auerr that the defendantes doe Confederate and
Combine together to defraude ye kinges Maiestie of the premisses
belonging to his Highnes as is sett furth in the said Informacion and of
the rentes and profittes due and paiable vnto his
Maiestie in right of his Crowne for the same and to obscure the premisses
where they lye and the boundes limittes and names thereof and doe publish
and diuulge new names soe that the same maye not be discerned and knowne from the
lands of the Bushopp of Winchester and doe entitle the said Bushopp to his
Maiesties Lands in such sorte as in the replicacion is truelye
declared and aledged And also the defendantes haue sett and made
fals the bounders of the premisses in such sorte as in the said
Informacion is truely declared. Without that that all the said
Messuages and landes Called the Beare Garden in the Inheritance
of the bushopp of Winchester and not his Maiesties Inheritances as in the
said Answere is supposed ffor his Maiesties said Atturney further saith
that the greatest parte of the same Messuages and lands are his
Maiesties in Inheritance in such sorte as in the said
Informacion is truely declared and sett downe And his Maiesties
said Atturney further saith that the defendant Meade was tenant to Mr Allan
and Mrs Henslowe his mother in law and paid them rent for that which was
holden of his Maiestie as aforesaid and after by practise turned from them
Without that that the said William Henslowe hath or ought to haue all the
beare garden whether the same be the Inheritance of his Maiestie or of the
said Bushopp as in the said Answere is pretended And his Maiesties said
Atturney doth auerr that the said Phillipp Henslowe when he laid the new building
Called the Hope Play house had once directed the foundacion thereof to be
soe laide as that the same building wold haue stoode parte vpon the
Kinges Maiesties land and parte vpon the Bushopps lands
and that the same Phillippe Henslowe altered his purpose and openly declared that he
wold erect the said new building soe neare as he Could onelye vpon the
kinges lands and therevpon sett the said new building whollye vpon the
kinges lands in such sorte as in the said Informacion is truely
declared And his Maiesties said Atturney further saith and doth auer that
the defendant Iacob Meade doth occupie his Maiesties Land vnder
the said William Henslowe in such sorte as in the said Informacion
is settfurth and denieth that the now erected buldinges Called the Hope and
other the lands in the occupacion of the defendant
Meade were euer reputed to be parcell of the beare garden and to
be parcell of the Bushopps Land and not his Maiesties Land in such
sorte as in the said ‸⸢Iacob Mede his Answere is alledged And his
Maiesties said Atturney doth auer ye practyses and Confederacies
betwene <..>
pretendeth in such sorte as in ye said⸣
Informacion is sett furth with this that the said
defendant Henslow hath entred into bond vnto the other defendant in such
sorte as in the said Informacion is declared And his Maiesties
said Atturney further doth auerr that the said Agnes by reason of the probate of the
said Phillipp Henslowes will and by the said executourshipp was interessed
in the demise and grant of the premisses made by the late Queene Elizabeth and in
the terme of yeares therein to Come and vnexpired in such sorte in as in
the said Informacion is declared. And without that. that anye
other matter article or thing in the defendantes said Answere
Conteined materiall or effectuall in the law to be replied vnto and herein not
sufficiently replied vnto Confessed and avoided trauersed or denied is true
All which matters his Maiesties said Atturney doth auerr and wilbe
ready to prove as this Honourable Court shall award And praieth as
in his said Informacion he hath praied. &c/
(signed) I. Iacksonn 1618
Addressed in the bill of complaint (item 1) were: Thomas Howard (1561–1626), eleventh earl of Suffolk, lord treasurer, 1614–1619; Sir Fulke Greville (1554–1628), first Baron Brooke of Beauchamps Court, who was chancellor of the Exchequer, 1614–1621; and Sir Lawrence Tanfield, chief baron of the Exchequer, 1607–25. Sir Henry Yelverton (1566–1630) served as attorney general from 12 March 1617/18 to June 1620. See Pauline Croft, 'Howard, Thomas, first earl of Suffolk (1561–1626), naval officer and administrator,' ODNB, accessed 10 December 2022; John Gouws, 'Greville, Fulke, first Baron Brooke of Beauchamps Court (1554–1628), courtier and author,' ODNB, accessed 10 December 2022; E.I. Carlyle and David Ibbetson (rev), 'Tanfield, Sir Lawrence (c. 1551–1625), lawyer,' accessed 10 December 2022; S.R. Gardiner and Louis A. Knafla (rev), 'Yelverton, Sir Henry (1566–1630), judge and politician,' ODNB, accessed 10 December 2022.
Some entries in the diary of Edward Alleyn show how the case proceeded. See, for example, 14 November 1620: 'I went to ye bishope of Winton about viewing wrightings'; 20–21 November: 'I wase att ye Lord of wintons... we dispatcht ye busines of wrightings'; see Ioppolo, Henslowe-Allen Digitisation Project. This is supported by an entry of 22 November 1620 in the Exchequer orders and decrees; see Appendix 4 V r. Further orders follow Appendix 4 V, s-w. See also TNA: E 124/29, f 255, 22 November 1620, Anglo-American Legal Traditions website. For some further orders in the Exchequer regarding this case dispute, see ff 332v, 339; E 124/30 ff 197, 265v; E 124/31, ff 250; and E 124/32, f 197v.
Record title: Court of Exchequer: Attorney General v. the Bishop of
Winchester, William Henslowe, and Jacob Meade
Repository:
TNA
Shelfmark: E 112/126
Repository location: Kew
In May 1618 this bill of information was raised in the Exchequer and addressed to the attorney general, then Henry Yelverton (in office March 1617-June 20), by the relation of Edward Alleyn. Extensive litigation followed; see Appendix 4: V.
The bill concerned who held the rights and the boundaries of the Bear Garden, then situated in part on the bishop of Winchester's properties at the Barge, Bell and Cock on Bankside and in part on the Crown lands lying to its west and south. Initially, the defendants were William Henslowe and Jacob Meade, who had occupied the whole property on the death of Agnes Henslowe. Commissioners were appointed by letters patent to investigate in June 1618 (Appendix 4: V. e), and Lancelot Andrews, then Bishop of Winchester, was also called to answer the bill in January 1619/20. The case dragged on until at least 1622, but as far as we have ascertained was not settled in the lifetime of the parties. William Henslowe died in 1624; see Appendix 4, VIII. Jacob Meade also died in that year and Alleyn in 1626; see Honigmann and Brock, Playhouse Wills, pp 134–8, 150–54.
For the interrogatories and depositions in this case; see Appendix 4: VI.
1618–20; English; parchment; 6 membranes;
arabic numbering in pencil in lower right corner; no endorsements;
attached at top left hand corner with string (modern) and modern label
with title: 'Bills, Answers, &tc | JAMES I. | SURREY. | No. 165
|containing (blank) membranes.' Stored in the
second of two large boxes with other court of Exchequer cases for Surrey
dated 24 March 1601/2–27 March 1625.
mb 1: Bill of Complaint;
undated, c [8–14 May] 1618; 630mm x 750mm; serious
damage, fading, and loss of text especially on the right edge (measuring
on average 80mm), tear at left side 460mm from top edge, extending 130mm
in width, small tears and fraying to right edge, creasing and crumpling
at foot of document, c 170mm from foot; no
decoration.
mb 2: Answer of William Henslowe and Jacob Meade; 8
June 1618; 415mm x 610mm; reasonable condition, some fading to the
middle; no decoration.
mb 3: Rejoinder of William Henslowe and
Jacob Meade; undated, c June-September 1618;
240mm x 375mm; no decoration.
mb 4: Answer of Lancelot, Bishop of
Winchester; 3 February 1619/20; 310mm x 515mm; no decoration.
mb
5: Replication of Sir Henry Yelverton, Attorney General to the Answer of
the Bishop of Winchester; Easter term, 1620; 102mm x 365mm; not
transcribed, adding no relevant details.
mb 6: Replication of Sir
Henry Yelverton, Attorney General to the Answers of Henslowe and Meade;
Trinity term, 1618; 480mm x 500mm; faded and stained along the upper
left corner; no decoration.