Item 3, ff [1–8] (22 June) (Depositions on behalf of John Digges and John Gape)
Depositiones Capte apud Westmonasterium xxijdo die Iunij anno Regni domine Regine Elizabethe nunc &c xxvjti ex parte Iohannis Digges et Iohannis Gape deffendantes versus Edwardum Bowes Querentem/
Richard Dunkyn of the parishe of whyttington Colledge in London Scryvener of the age of Liiij yeres or there aboughtes sworne and examined the day and yere abouesaid deposithe and saiethe
To the ffirst Interrogatory this depounent saiethe he knowethe the said Edward Bowes esquyre Iohn digges Iohn Gape William Glouer Iohn napton and morgan pope
To the second Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that this depounentes servaunt did wright one Indenture of assigment made ffrom the said Iohn Napton vnto the said Iohn digges and Iohn Gape beringe date the xxiiijth of marche in the xxjth of hir maiesties Raigne that now is Whereby the said Iohn napton did sett over all his Interest in Certeyn tenementes and Beares houses and bull howses and yardes which is now Callid paris gardien/ And that one of the Counterpayns of the said Indenture was selid and delyuerid by the said John napton in this depounent es presentes bona ffide ‸⸢ as farr as this deponant doth knowe⸣ . But the Certeyn tyme of thenselinge of the said Indentures this depounent Remembrithe not but saiethe he is suer that the said Indentures weare sealid abought ffyve or vj dayes after the making thereof./ and more touchinge the said Interrogatory this depounent saiethe he Can not depose/
To the iij iiij v vj vij viij ix xth xj and xijth Interrogatory this depounent Can say nothinge more then he hathe all Reddie deposed./
per me (signed) Ricardum Dunkyn
Iohn Whytt of
St Mary Overes in t<.>
Southwerk yeoman of the age of Lj yeres or there aboughtes sworne and
Examined the daye and yere aboue said deposithe and saiethe
To the
ffirst Interrogatory this deponent saiethe that he knowethe the
said Edward Bowes esquyre Iohn diges and the said william Glouer
and the said Iohn Naptone and william But the said Iohn Gape and
morgan pope he saiethe he knowethe not./
To the ij iij iiij v and vjth Interrogatory this depounent Can say nothinge
To the vijth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that the said Iohn digges hathe paid the Rent vnto this said depounent for these iij yeres for the said beare gardein and other the premissis now in question betwene the said Bowes digges and gape and that the Rent of the Beare gardein is vj li. a yere and the tenement that Iohn napton dwellithe in fortie shillinges a yere. for this depounent saiethe that he is owner thereof.
To the viiij ix xth xj and xijth Interrogatory this depounent Can say nothing |
(signed) Iohn whyt
Thomas Sewall of the parishe of St Lawrence in the old Iury in London grocer of the age of xlij yeres or there aboughtes sworne and examined the day and examined the day and yere abouesaid deposithe and saieth
To the ffirst Interrogatory this deponent saiethe he knowethe the saide Edward Bowes esquyere Iohn digges Iohn Gape william glouer Iohn napton and the said morgan pope
To the second Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that to his nowe Remembraunce he was present at thenselinge and delyuerie of one Indenture of assignment made from the said Iohn napton vnto the said Iohn digges and Iohn gape beringe date the xxiiijth of Marche in the xxjth yere of the Raigne of her Maiestie that now is whereby the said Iohn napton did assigne vnto the saide Iohn digges and Iohn Gape all his Right tytell and Interest into Certeyn tenementes Beare houses and Bull houses which now is Callid paris gardein and mencionid in the said Indenture: But when the same was selid this depounent saiethe he Certeinlie knowethe not. But saiethe that he knowethe that the same was selid and delyuerid Bona ffide. And ffurther saiethe that this said depounent by the means and procurement of the said Iohn napton Iohn gape and Iohn digges did putt forthe the said Indentures of assigment to be made by one dunckyn a Scryvener.
To the third Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that he this saide depounent was present when as the said digges and Gape did pay for the said Iohn napton for the debt of the said Iohn napton vnto one Edward wystow of which said wystow the said Iohn napton had before that tyme bought the lesse and the game in the afforesaid gardein the some of .C. li. and to this depounent es now Remembraunce there was bandes geuen vnto the | said wystow of CC li. more for the said Iohn napton/ And this depounent saiethe that he hathe hard the said diges and gape ‸⸢and one william napton⸣ Confesse that they had disbursid and layd owt vnto the said Iohn napton and to his vse for the said assigment the some of CCCCC li. and more./ and to this depounent es knowledge there was no Corrupt Chevysaunce or excessiue vsury or any vsury at all in the said matter./
To the iiijth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that to his now Remembranc he did not see the said Edward Bowes in Londone synce the suete by the said digges and gape was Comensid in the kinges Benche
To the vth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that he hathe hard that the said william glouer hathe Bene Imploied in the said Beare gardein Comonlie Callid paris gardein as a seruant of the said Edward Bowes. and saiethe that he hathe senne hym the said william glouer in the saide gardein./
To the vjthth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe he Can say nothinge to his now Remembraunce.
To the vijth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that one whytte beinge the owner of the said tenementes and Bear gardeins did tell this said depounent that the said digges did for these iij yeres ‸⸢past⸣ pay vnto hym the Rent for the said Beare gardein and other the said premisses now in question
To the viijth ‸⸢and ixth⸣ Interrogatory this depounent Can say nothinge
To the tenthe Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that he hathe hard the said pope hathe bene a sutor and procuerid means for a Composition in the Cause in question. And that he did offer money for the same Composition of his own accord/
To the xjth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that at the said tryall in Southwerk against the said glouer there were more witnesses then the said Iohn naptons wyffe and his brother ffor this depounent | saiethe that he this said depounent was there as a witnes and was sworn and did gyve in evidence. and there was allso to be sworne the wyffe of Edward wystowe and others.
To the xijth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that he beinge in presentes vpon the tuesday after the Last term with one Cudworthe the said Cudworthe did shew vnto this said depounent a notte of euerie weakes gayn of the said bear house and gardein begyninge at the xijth day of Aprill last past as he now Remembrithe vnto the said tuesdaye. and by that it did appere that there was Rceyuid by the said Cudworthe for the Benyfitt of the said gardein the some of Lx li. or more. And more to the said Interrogatory this depounent saiethe he Can not depose./ (signed) Thomas Sewall |
William napton of the parishe of St Lawrence in the old Iurie in London grocer of the age of xxxviij yeres or there aboughtes sworne and examined the day and yere abouesaid deposithe and saiethe
To the ffirst Interrogatory this depounent saiethe he knowethe the saide Edward Bowes Esquyre Iohn digges Iohn gape william glouer Iohn napton and the said morgan pope
To the second
Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that he knowethe that the
said Iohn napton did bargayn sell and delyuer as his deade and
assigment made by ‸⸢hym⸣ the said Iohn napton
of all his Interest of all his Interest and Right aswell into Certein
tenementes Beare houses and Bull houses now Comonlie Callid
paris gardein as allso with all the game of Bears and bulls
doges and all other the
games there. which was made and done by one Indenture beringe date the
xxiiijti day of marche in the xxjth yere of the Raigne of the Quennes maiestie
that now is vnto the said Iohn dygges and Iohn gape. and that the same
deade was selid and delyuerid in this depounent es
presentes. but vpon what day Certeinlie this depounent
saiethe he Remembrithe not. But saiethe that the same Indenture was sealid and
delyuerd Bona ffide
To the third
Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that the said
diges and gape disbursid to one Edward wystowe for the saide Iohn napton
of which said wystowe the said Iohn napton did Buy the Lease of the said
ground and ‸
game houses and allso bought the said game. the some of C li. and ‸⸢this said⸣
entered ‸ ⸢depounent and Iohn gape did
enter⸣ into Bandes to the said Edward wistowe for the
payment of CC li. more at Certeyn dayes. and allso that the said Iohn
napton beinge Indebted vnto this said depounent in the some of CCCCC li. at
the lest and to the said Iohn gape and Iohn digges in dyvers other great
somes which before that tyme they had lent and paid for the debt of the
said Iohn napton this depounent did assu appoint over his said
debt of ffyve hondred poundes vnto | the said Iohn
Gape and Iohn digges takinge there promyse for the
payment thereof as they should Receyue the some of the said Iohn Naptone/
all which said somes beinge agread vpon which were paide by the
said digges and gape for the said Iohn napton together with this
said depounentes CCCCC li. did amount vnto xjCx li. which was agread to be paid by the said
Iohn napton owt of the profittes that should aryse owt of ‸⸢the proff⸣ the said Beare
gardines by iiij li. wekelie vntill that the said some of xj hondred
and ten poundes were paide. withowt any Interest vsury or Corrupt delynge
for the same./ and more he Can not depose
To the iiijth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that to his knowledg he hathe not sene the said Edward Bowes in London synce the said suete by the said digges and gape was Comensid in the kynges Benche
To the vthInterrogatory this depounent saiethe that the said william glouer hathe bene Imploide in the said Beare gardein Callid paris gardein as this depounent hathe hard as the Reputed servant of the said Edward Bowes.
To the vjth this depounent saiethe to his now Remebran he Can say nothing./
To the vijth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that the said Iohn digges hathe paid the Rent for these iij yeres. for the said beare gardein and other the said premisses now in question betwene the said Bowes diges and gape. and that the Rent of the said premisses is viij li. a yere./
To the viij and ixth Interrogatory this depounent Can say nothinge to his now Remembraunce./
To the xth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that he knowethe that the said pope hathe often tymes bene a sutor for a composition in the said Cause in question. and that he did offer money of his Own accord to haue a Composition./
To the xjth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe that there were
witnessis at the said Tryall in Southwerk against the said glouer | besides this said depounent es and the said
Iohn naptons wyffe one Richard dunkyn scryuener and Thomas sewall grocer
which were there then deposid besides iij or iiij other which
were there Reddie to haue bene deposid if that they had bene Callid. viz
there was the wyffe of Edward wistow decessid Iohn whytt and one dorell
To the xijth Interrogatory this depounent saiethe
to his knowledge the said mr Bowes or his assignes hathe haue taken the
whole benifitt of the said gardein and game synce his entraunce but to what valew he
saiethe he knowethe not. But saiethe that the said game viz bears bulls apes
Lyon and doges were
worthe as this depounent hathe hard more then CC li. / and more he Can not
depose./
(signed) William Napton
Record title: Court of Requests: Edward Bowes v. John Digges and John
Gape
Repository:
TNA
Shelfmark: REQ 2/177/35
Repository location: Kew
In this case of 1584, Edward Bowes launched a countersuit against John Digges and John Gape in the court of Requests regarding who was the rightful lessee of the Bear Garden on the Barge, Bell and Cock property. Edward Wistowe, after leasing the property from William Payne in 1572–3, had in 1578 assigned it to grocer John Napton. Napton, in serious financial difficulties, in March 1578-9 assigned it to his creditors Digges and Gape, and then in December 1579 to another creditor, the goldsmith Morgan Pope. Pope and Edward Bowes (a brother of Ralph Bowes, then Master of Bears) and William Glover began games there. Digges and Gape then brought suits against Bowes and Glover, possibly initially in the Southwark Assizes and in the King's Bench. From there the case was taken to the court of Requests. It seems the court's decision was in favour of Pope and Bowes, or there was a settlement, as between 1585–90 Pope retained control of the Bear Garden.
See also Letter from Sir Francis Walsingham to the Lords of the Privy Council, and Court of Requests: Order in the case of Bowes v. Digges and Gape.
Not much is known of Digges and Gape. John Digges seems likely to have been the illegitimate son of Edmund Tilney (1536–1610), master of the Revels, 1579–1610. He was a merchant taylor and an employee of the Revels Office from 1579 until 1585, though somewhat dodgy in character; see further William Streitberger, The Masters of the Revels and Elizabeth I's Court Theatre (Oxford, 2016), 148–9.
1584; English and Latin; 8 items;
unnumbered; tied with string at the top left corner:
Item 1: 26
June 1584; paper; 17 leaves, written on one side only; approximately
345mm x 265mm, except for f [14] a torn fragment 272mm x 185mm;
unnumbered; some fraying to edges; no decoration; no endorsement.
Depositions on behalf of Edward Bowes, each leaf signed at the foot by
the deponent in question or on his behalf.
Item 2: undated;
parchment; single membrane, written one side only; 575mm x 575mm; good
condition; no endorsement. Interrogatories on behalf of Edward Bowes.
Item 3: 22 June 1584; paper; 345mm x 255m; 8 leaves; written on
one side only; unnumbered; good condition; no decoration; paper tie in
top left corner. Depositions on behalf of John Digges and John Gape,
each leaf signed by deponent or on his behalf.
Item 4: undated;
parchment; single membrane; 400mm x 285mm; hole (40mm x 50mm) at the
foot but no loss of text; no decoration; no endorsement. Interrogatories
on the behalf of John Digges and John Gape.
Item 5: 20 June 1584;
parchment; single membrane; 128mm x 435mm; good condition; no
decoration; no endorsement. Rejoinder of John Digges and John Gape.
Item 6: 6 May 1584; vellum; single membrane; 330mm x 450mm; good
condition; no decoration; no endorsement. Replication of Edward Bowes.
Item 7: 11 February 1583/4; vellum; single membrane; 340mm x 485mm
(text area: 250mm x 455mm); no decoration; good condition; no
endorsement. Answer of John Digges and John Gape.
Item 8: 30
January 1583/4; parchment; single membrane; 360mm x 600mm; no
decoration; generally good condition, 2 small holes but no loss of text;
endorsed: 'Edwardus Bowes Esq versus Iohannem
Gape et | Iohannem Digges defendentes,' left
hand side: 'xxxo die Ianuarij Anno |
Regni Regine Elizabethe Etc xxvito | fuit Breve de Privato
Sigillo directum parti
defendentis ad | comparendum
Immediate sub pena C li. Etc | Vocetur
per municionem,' followed by signatures,
'Thomas Se<..>on' and the
second illegible. Bill of Complaint.