Item 6, single membrane (6 May) (Replication of Edward Bowes)
The
Replicacion of Edward
Bowes Esquire one of her maiestes ordinary
seruantes Complaynaunte
to the Aunswere of Iohn digges and Iohn Gape
Defendantes/
The said Complaynaunte Doth and will auerr and maynteyne his said bill of
Complainte and euerie matter and thinge therin conteyned to be iuste and true in
such sorte manner and forme as the same are therin verie truly sett fourth and
alledged. And ffurther saieth that the said Aunswere is very vntrue vncerten and
insufficyent in the Lawe to bee replied vnto for diuers euident and apparant matters
therin manifestlie appearinge, The advauntauge of Exception in and to the
vncertentie and insufficyency whereof att all tymes saued to this
Complaynaunte ffor replicacion in and to the same this
Complaynaunte saiethe That the said Iohn napton in the said bill and aunswere
mencioned beinge possessed of the said garden games and other the premisses
in the said bill mencioned by his Indenture or wrytinge bearinge date the
three and twentith daie of december in the two and twentith yere of her said
maiestes raigne did demise graunte and to ferme lett all the
same premisses and the games proffytes and Commodities thereof vnto the
said morgan pope for the Terme of
ffourtie yeres to be accompted from the feaste of St michaell Tharchaungell Last past
before the date of the same Indenture withine vpon Condicion
therin conteyned That yf the said Iohn Napton his executors or assignes or any of
them should well and truly paie or cause to be paide to the said morgan Pope his
executours or assignes the somme of one hundreth and twentie
poundes of good and Lawfull money of England att certen daies in the said
Indenture Lymited nowe past That then the saide Indenture should cease determyne and
be vtterly voide/ of and in the paymente of which somme of one
hundrethe twenty poundes the said Iohn Napton his heires executours
administratours and assignes and euerie of them did faille and make
defaulte, By vertue whereof and of the said demise and Lease the saide morgan Pope
into all the saide premisses did enter and was thereof possessed for and duringe all
the saide terme of ffourty yeres, And so beinge thereof possessed
afterwardes and after defaulte made of and in the paymente of the said
somme of one hundredth and twenty poundes The said morgan Pope
by his sufficyent Deede in writinge for and in consideracion of a greate
somme of money to him by your supplyant well and truly satisfyed and
contented did alyen assigne and settouer the said tenement beare garden and all
other the premisses with their appurtenaunces to
this Complayaunte his executours and assignes for and duringe so
many yeres of the said terme of ffourtie yeres as were then to come and vnexpired,
And that by vertue thereof this Complaynaunte did enter in and to the same
premisses and was thereof possessed accordinglie, And the rentes
proffyttes and Commodyties thereof did receyve and take to this
Complaynauntes owne vse and behouf, And in and aboute the same
did place all the beares
dogges and other
thinges in the said bill mencioned for the better seruice
of and furnisshinge of her said maiestes game and
pastyme As in the said bill is alledged, And that the said Defendantes haue
by Casuall meanes gott into their handes and possession the said originall Indenture
of Lease and confirmacion in the said bill mencioned And the other
Indentures and wrytinges towchinge and concerninge the
conveyaunces and assignement thereof in righte belonginge to this
Complaynaunte, And do seeke to suppresse and with holde the same
from this complaynaunte, And by meanes thereof haue made sundry vnlawfull
Entryes in and to the same premisses and haue Commenced suite against this
Complaynaunte and the said william Glouer for the holdinge and occupyinge thereof As in the
said Bill of Complainte is lykewise alledged/ Without that that the said
Iohn napton by any Indenture or writinge bearinge date the ffoure and twentith Daie
of marche in the saide one and twentith yere of the Quenes
maiestes moste gracious raigne did graunte and assigne all his
estate title and interest and terme of yeres in the premisses to the said Iohn
Digges and Iohn Gape the defendantes, or that by reason
of any suche graunte or assignemente they did or mighte enter and were lawfully
possessed of the same premisses as in the saide aunswere ys vntruly surmysed ffor
this Complaynaunte sayeth that yf any such graunte or assignement were made
by the saide napton to the saide defendantes That yet the same was
made either vpon vnlawfull and Corrupte Cheuisance and for excessyve vsurye or for
and vpon some Crafte and fraud
to deceyve the saide morgan Pope of such duties as were due to him
by the saide Iohn napton, And by reason thereof vtterly voide and of none effect,
without that that this Complaynaunte or the said Glouer haue
vsed any extraordynarie deuises or delayes in pleadinge as in the said aunswere ys
lykewise vntruly surmysed, or that this Complaynaunte knoweth any iuste or
true title of the defendantes in and to the same premisses or seeketh to
frustrate the same by any harde dealinge As in the said Aunswere is Lykewise vntruly
and slaunderously alledged, And
without that that any other matter cause or thinge in the said Aunswere
conteyned materyall or effectuall for this Complaynaunte to replie vnto and
nott herin sufficyentlie replyed vnto denyed and trauersed or confessed and avoided
is true All which matters this Complaynaunte is readie to auerr
and proue as this moste honourable Courte shall awarde and praieth as before in his
said bill of Complainte hee hath praiede/
(signed) Paget
6. maij 1584
Record title: Court of Requests: Edward Bowes v. John Digges and John
Gape
Repository:
TNA
Shelfmark: REQ 2/177/35
Repository location: Kew
In this case of 1584, Edward Bowes launched a countersuit against John Digges and John Gape in the court of Requests regarding who was the rightful lessee of the Bear Garden on the Barge, Bell and Cock property. Edward Wistowe, after leasing the property from William Payne in 1572–3, had in 1578 assigned it to grocer John Napton. Napton, in serious financial difficulties, in March 1578-9 assigned it to his creditors Digges and Gape, and then in December 1579 to another creditor, the goldsmith Morgan Pope. Pope and Edward Bowes (a brother of Ralph Bowes, then Master of Bears) and William Glover began games there. Digges and Gape then brought suits against Bowes and Glover, possibly initially in the Southwark Assizes and in the King's Bench. From there the case was taken to the court of Requests. It seems the court's decision was in favour of Pope and Bowes, or there was a settlement, as between 1585–90 Pope retained control of the Bear Garden.
See also Letter from Sir Francis Walsingham to the Lords of the Privy Council, and Court of Requests: Order in the case of Bowes v. Digges and Gape.
Not much is known of Digges and Gape. John Digges seems likely to have been the illegitimate son of Edmund Tilney (1536–1610), master of the Revels, 1579–1610. He was a merchant taylor and an employee of the Revels Office from 1579 until 1585, though somewhat dodgy in character; see further William Streitberger, The Masters of the Revels and Elizabeth I's Court Theatre (Oxford, 2016), 148–9.
1584; English and Latin; 8 items;
unnumbered; tied with string at the top left corner:
Item 1: 26
June 1584; paper; 17 leaves, written on one side only; approximately
345mm x 265mm, except for f [14] a torn fragment 272mm x 185mm;
unnumbered; some fraying to edges; no decoration; no endorsement.
Depositions on behalf of Edward Bowes, each leaf signed at the foot by
the deponent in question or on his behalf.
Item 2: undated;
parchment; single membrane, written one side only; 575mm x 575mm; good
condition; no endorsement. Interrogatories on behalf of Edward Bowes.
Item 3: 22 June 1584; paper; 345mm x 255m; 8 leaves; written on
one side only; unnumbered; good condition; no decoration; paper tie in
top left corner. Depositions on behalf of John Digges and John Gape,
each leaf signed by deponent or on his behalf.
Item 4: undated;
parchment; single membrane; 400mm x 285mm; hole (40mm x 50mm) at the
foot but no loss of text; no decoration; no endorsement. Interrogatories
on the behalf of John Digges and John Gape.
Item 5: 20 June 1584;
parchment; single membrane; 128mm x 435mm; good condition; no
decoration; no endorsement. Rejoinder of John Digges and John Gape.
Item 6: 6 May 1584; vellum; single membrane; 330mm x 450mm; good
condition; no decoration; no endorsement. Replication of Edward Bowes.
Item 7: 11 February 1583/4; vellum; single membrane; 340mm x 485mm
(text area: 250mm x 455mm); no decoration; good condition; no
endorsement. Answer of John Digges and John Gape.
Item 8: 30
January 1583/4; parchment; single membrane; 360mm x 600mm; no
decoration; generally good condition, 2 small holes but no loss of text;
endorsed: 'Edwardus Bowes Esq versus Iohannem
Gape et | Iohannem Digges defendentes,' left
hand side: 'xxxo die Ianuarij Anno |
Regni Regine Elizabethe Etc xxvito | fuit Breve de Privato
Sigillo directum parti
defendentis ad | comparendum
Immediate sub pena C li. Etc | Vocetur
per municionem,' followed by signatures,
'Thomas Se<..>on' and the
second illegible. Bill of Complaint.