Item 7, single membrane (11 February 1583/4) (Answer of John Digges and John Gape)
The
Aunswere of Iohn Digges and Iohn Gape Defendantes
to the Byll of Complainte of Edward
Bowes Esquier
Complaynaunte
The sayde defendantes by protestacion not acknoledginge the
matters in the sayde Byll of Complainte Sett forthhe and declared to be trewe in
manner and fforme as they are in the sayde Byll Suggested, the advauntage
of exepcion ‸⸢to⸣ the vncerteyntye and
Insufficiencye wherrof vnto thes defendantes at all tymes hearafter Saved,
and ffor playne Declaracion of the truthe of the matters therin Conteyned
sayethe that trewe yt ys as this defendantes takethe ytt, That Steven Late Byshoppe of wynton by his
Indenture beringe date the sixte daye of marche in the xxxjth yeare of the Reigne of the late kinge of famus memorye kynge Henrye the
eighte did demyse and to ffarme Lett vnto one william Payne nowe decessed certeine Capitall
messuages and Tenementes Called the Barge the Bell and the Cocke Scituate and beinge vppon the
Banke Somtyme Called the Stewes
buttinge and lyinge as in the sayde byll is declared, with divers ‸⸢other⸣ smale howses gardens and wharfes and all the
commodities and profittes Cominge in and vppon the same or anye
parte therof for the terme of fowerscore and nynteine years to be
accompted from the feaste of
thanunciacion of our Ladye Saint Marye the virgin nexte ensuinge
the date of the same Indenture ffor the yearlye Rente of ix s and sixe pence payable
yearlye at the ffeaste of
Saint mychaell tharkangell and thanunciacion of our Ladye Sainte marye
the virgin by even porcons, which sayde lease was lawfullye Confirmed and
alowed of by the then Deane and chapiter of wynton, By vertue wherof the sayde
william payne did enter into the sayde messuages and other the premisses
and was possessed accordinglye, which sayde messuages are nowe called the
ovlde beare Garden or
parishe garden and vsed and Imployede for the kepinge and baytinge of Boulles
beares and other games as in the
sayde Byll theye are Sett forthe and declared, And afterwardes at or aboute
the tyme mencionede in the sayde Byll as this defendantes
thinkethe the sayde william Payne did demise and graunte the sayde Smale
howses, gardens, and wharffes parcell of the premisses by
the name of the Tenementes, beere howses, Bullhowse, yeardes, and
baytinge place, vnto one Edwarde
wystowe by forse of which demise & graunte, The sayde Edwarde
wystowe did Enter into all the Same laste demysed premisses and was therof
possessed accordingelye as in the sayde Byll is declared, and he soe beinge therof
possessed did graunte assigne and sett over the same premisses and all his
estate Righte tytle Intereste and terme of yeares therin then to come and the
wryttinges and Indentures therof vnto one Iohn napton Citizen and grocer of london whoe by forse therof likwyse Entered in and
to the same and was therof possessed muche to thentente as in the sayde Byll of
Complaynte is declared as thes defendantes thinkethe, and
whereas ‸⸢after⸣ the sayd Iohn napton soe beinge
therof possessed by his Indenture or Writtinge by him Sealed and delyvered as his
deed bering date the xxiiijth daye of marche in the one
and twentyeth yeare of the Queens maiesties moste gratious Reigne that
nowe is, ffor divers good Cawses and sideracons him movinge did graunte and assigne
all his estate tytle and Intereste & terme of yeares in the premisses
vnto the sayd Iohn Digges and Iohn Gape these defendantes whoe by
Reason of the same entered & were lawfullye possessed of the premisses,
vntyll by william Glover A persone mencioned in the sayde
byll was °disspossessed° Againste whome the sayde Iohn Digges & Iohn Gape
serued as in the sayde byll ‸⸢ ys declared⸣
whervnto he hathe pleded not gyltye, after divers extraordinarye devises,
which deleyes deserveth noe ffavore/ without that that the sayd
demise and graunte made to the sayde Iohn Digges and Iohn Gape, by the sayde Iohn
Napton was made vppon vnlawfull and corrupte Chevisance and for Excessive vsurye, or
Craftelye for to deceve the
sayde morgane Pope as in the sayde byll is moste Slanderuslye alleaged which ‸⸢yf ytt we<..>
trewe⸣may well ayde the sayde william Glouere at
the Common lawe, were the same trewe without that the sayde Iohn
Napton did alien assigne and sett over the sayde Tenementes beare garden,
and all other the premisses with their
appurtenaunces before the Lawfull
°conveyance° as aforesayde made to the sayde
defendantes, without that the sayd
defendantes have anye deedes or writtinge apperteyninge
to the sayde Supplycation as in the sayde byll is vntrulye Suggested to
theire vnderstandinge, with that the sayde morgan pope and your
maiesties Supplicante (by Credible Reporte) <........> knoweth the trewe tytle of
your defendantes, as aforsayde, Thoughe the
Complay°naunt° by harde dealinge doe seeke to
ffrustrate the same and without that allsoe anye other matter or matters
Thinge or thinges in the Sayde Byll of Complainte conteyned materiall in
Lawe to be Aunswered vnto by these defendantes and in this Aunswer
not confessed or avoyded trauersed denyed or otherwyse sufficientlye
Aunswered vnto is trewe to these defendantes knowledge All
which matters these defendantes are Reddye to Averr and
prove as this honorable Courte shall awarde and prayethe to be dismissed
with their Reasonable Costes and charges in this behalfe
wrongfully susteyned
(signed) Agmondsham
Record title: Court of Requests: Edward Bowes v. John Digges and John
Gape
Repository:
TNA
Shelfmark: REQ 2/177/35
Repository location: Kew
In this case of 1584, Edward Bowes launched a countersuit against John Digges and John Gape in the court of Requests regarding who was the rightful lessee of the Bear Garden on the Barge, Bell and Cock property. Edward Wistowe, after leasing the property from William Payne in 1572–3, had in 1578 assigned it to grocer John Napton. Napton, in serious financial difficulties, in March 1578-9 assigned it to his creditors Digges and Gape, and then in December 1579 to another creditor, the goldsmith Morgan Pope. Pope and Edward Bowes (a brother of Ralph Bowes, then Master of Bears) and William Glover began games there. Digges and Gape then brought suits against Bowes and Glover, possibly initially in the Southwark Assizes and in the King's Bench. From there the case was taken to the court of Requests. It seems the court's decision was in favour of Pope and Bowes, or there was a settlement, as between 1585–90 Pope retained control of the Bear Garden.
See also Letter from Sir Francis Walsingham to the Lords of the Privy Council, and Court of Requests: Order in the case of Bowes v. Digges and Gape.
Not much is known of Digges and Gape. John Digges seems likely to have been the illegitimate son of Edmund Tilney (1536–1610), master of the Revels, 1579–1610. He was a merchant taylor and an employee of the Revels Office from 1579 until 1585, though somewhat dodgy in character; see further William Streitberger, The Masters of the Revels and Elizabeth I's Court Theatre (Oxford, 2016), 148–9.
1584; English and Latin; 8 items;
unnumbered; tied with string at the top left corner:
Item 1: 26
June 1584; paper; 17 leaves, written on one side only; approximately
345mm x 265mm, except for f [14] a torn fragment 272mm x 185mm;
unnumbered; some fraying to edges; no decoration; no endorsement.
Depositions on behalf of Edward Bowes, each leaf signed at the foot by
the deponent in question or on his behalf.
Item 2: undated;
parchment; single membrane, written one side only; 575mm x 575mm; good
condition; no endorsement. Interrogatories on behalf of Edward Bowes.
Item 3: 22 June 1584; paper; 345mm x 255m; 8 leaves; written on
one side only; unnumbered; good condition; no decoration; paper tie in
top left corner. Depositions on behalf of John Digges and John Gape,
each leaf signed by deponent or on his behalf.
Item 4: undated;
parchment; single membrane; 400mm x 285mm; hole (40mm x 50mm) at the
foot but no loss of text; no decoration; no endorsement. Interrogatories
on the behalf of John Digges and John Gape.
Item 5: 20 June 1584;
parchment; single membrane; 128mm x 435mm; good condition; no
decoration; no endorsement. Rejoinder of John Digges and John Gape.
Item 6: 6 May 1584; vellum; single membrane; 330mm x 450mm; good
condition; no decoration; no endorsement. Replication of Edward Bowes.
Item 7: 11 February 1583/4; vellum; single membrane; 340mm x 485mm
(text area: 250mm x 455mm); no decoration; good condition; no
endorsement. Answer of John Digges and John Gape.
Item 8: 30
January 1583/4; parchment; single membrane; 360mm x 600mm; no
decoration; generally good condition, 2 small holes but no loss of text;
endorsed: 'Edwardus Bowes Esq versus Iohannem
Gape et | Iohannem Digges defendentes,' left
hand side: 'xxxo die Ianuarij Anno |
Regni Regine Elizabethe Etc xxvito | fuit Breve de Privato
Sigillo directum parti
defendentis ad | comparendum
Immediate sub pena C li. Etc | Vocetur
per municionem,' followed by signatures,
'Thomas Se<..>on' and the
second illegible. Bill of Complaint.